Is China the Country of the Future?

Wikimedia

 

By Patrick Buchanan

“Who Lost China?”

With the fall of the Nationalist government of Chiang Kai-shek, the defeat of his armies and the flight to Formosa, that was the question of the hour in 1949. And no one demanded to know more insistently than the anti-Communist Congressman John F. Kennedy:

“Whatever share of the responsibility was Roosevelt’s and whatever share was (General George) Marshall’s, the vital interest of the United States in the independent integrity of China was sacrificed, and the foundation was laid for the present tragic situation in the Far East.”

Tragic indeed was the situation. The most populous nation on earth, for which America had risked and fought a war with the Japanese Empire, had been lost to Stalin’s empire.

A year after Peking fell to Mao Zedong, Chinese armies stormed into Korea to drive the Americans back from the Yalu River and back across the 38th parallel, threatening to throw them off the Peninsula.

In the seven decades since October 1949, millions of Chinese have perished in ideological pogroms like the “Great Leap Forward” of the ’50s, and the “Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution” during which President Nixon came to China.

Yet in terms of national and state power over those 70 years, and especially in the last 30 when America threw open her markets to Chinese goods and Beijing ran up $4 trillion to $5 trillion in trade surpluses with the U.S., a new China arose. It was on display this week in Tiananmen Square.

 

The China of Xi Jinping boasts land- and submarine-based missiles and bombers that provide a strategic deterrent against the United States. Beijing's conventional forces on land, sea, and in air and space rival any on earth.

Since Y2K, its economy has swept past that of Italy, France, Britain, Germany and Japan to become the world's second largest. China is now the world's premier manufacturing power.

Yet, under Xi Jinping, the mask of benign giant has slipped and the menacing face of 21st-century China is being revealed, for its people, its neighbors, and the world to see.

The Uighurs of west China are being forced into re-education camps to be cured of their tribalist, nationalist and Islamic beliefs. Christians are being persecuted. Tibetans are being replaced in their homeland by Han Chinese. The Communist Party's role and rule as the font of ideological, political and moral truth is being elevated and imposed.

The Chinese still hold land seized from India 50 years ago. China now claims as sovereign territory virtually all of a South China Sea, which encompasses territorial waters of six nations. It has begun building air, naval and military bases on rocks and reefs belonging to Manila.

China has warned foreign warships to stay out of the Taiwan Strait and has built up its force on the mainland opposite the island, warning that any move by Taiwan to declare independence would be regarded as an act of war. It claims the Japanese-held Senkaku Islands.

In its Belt and Road projects to tie China to Central and South Asia and Europe, China has lent billions to build ports, only to take possession of the facilities when local regimes default on their loans.

But not all is going well for the regime on its 70th birthday.

The people of Hong Kong, who are surely being cheered by many on the mainland of China, have been protesting for months, demanding the liberty and independence for which American patriots fought in our Revolution, not Mao's revolution.

Nor are the newly prosperous Chinese people fools. They relish the rising power of China and the respect their country commands in the world, but they know it was not Marx, Lenin or Mao who produced their prosperity. It was capitalism. They cannot but be uneasy seeing the freedoms and benefits they enjoy being dissipated in a trade war with the Americans and the new repression issuing from Beijing.

Among the epochal blunders America has committed since the end of the Cold War, three stand out.

The first was our disastrous plunge into the Middle East to create regimes oriented to the West. The second was the expansion of NATO to the front porch of Russia, driving the largest nation on earth, and one of its most formidable nuclear powers, into the arms of China.

The third was to throw open America's markets to Chinese goods on favorable terms, which led to the enrichment and empowerment of a regime whose long-term threat to U.S. interests and American values is as great as was that of the Soviet Union in the Cold War.

The question for America's statesmen is how to cope with the rising challenge of China while avoiding a war that would be a calamity for all mankind. Patience, prudence and perseverance commend themselves.

But the first necessity is to toss out the ideological liberalism which proclaims that David Ricardo's free trade dogmatism is truth for all nations at all times and that John Locke's ideas apply to all cultures and countries.

When you sign up to comment you'll also receive our regular newsletter. You can find more about how we use your information here.

21 thoughts on “Is China the Country of the Future?”

  1. Just like the terrorists on “911”, the Chinese take advantage of our free and open society in order to steal as mush as they can from us. They only agree to terms that benefit themselves and are a predatory nation whose intent is to take over the world. (Sound Familiar?) One only needs to look at their present internal and external policies to get a crystal clear preview of what our world would be like if they obtain dominance. The greatest thing they fear is if someone turns the light on in the room and exposes what they really represent. In reality they are simply a communist dictatorship that oppresses their own citizens and steals, bullies and intimidates to get what they want. But this “Chinese Vase” has a lot of cracks in it and is no match against Freedom!

    1. Bob, first-class response. And you have given most of the reasons why in 2020 you would be better off with Ten more Trumps.( I am a VERY pro-USA Englishman)
      Your down to earth analysis, excellently described, reminds me of a piece of advice I remembered since a young lad:
      “Set a thief to catch a thief”.
      When the thief has been neutered is the time to seek a different approach – which gives us a Trump-type in power for, let’s say…………Mmmmmm….thirty years?

  2. My youngest brother died in a restaurant in china 4 years ago and the pos doc refused to release his body until his wife paid him 16k. In cash so she had no choice but to call her father to send the money. The American consulate said its a communist country so they can do whatever they want. We couldnt even plan his funeral because we didnt know when he would be home. He was a navy veteran so we had a nice funeral despite those pigs in china.

  3. hello!,I love your writing so much! percentage we be in contact extra approximately your article on AOL?
    I need an expert on this space to unravel my problem.
    May be that’s you! Having a look forward to peer you.

  4. I am extremely impressed with your writing skills as smartly
    as with the layout on your blog. Is this a paid theme or did
    you customize it your self? Anyway stay up the nice quality writing, it
    is rare to peer a great weblog like this one nowadays..

  5. wonderful publish, very informative. I wonder why the other specialists of this sector don’t notice this.
    You should proceed your writing. I’m sure,
    you have a huge readers’ base already!

  6. I’m not that much of a internet reader to be honest
    but your sites really nice, keep it up! I’ll go ahead and
    bookmark your website to come back in the future. Cheers

  7. Hi, i think that i saw you visited my weblog so i came to “return the favor”.I am attempting to find things
    to enhance my site!I suppose its ok to use a few of your ideas!!

  8. What you said was very logical. However, think about this, what if you typed a catchier post title?
    I mean, I don’t wish to tell you how to run your blog, but what
    if you added a post title to possibly grab folk’s attention? I mean Inside Scoop Politics — DC Insider News for Main Street America
    is a little boring. You might glance at Yahoo’s home page and see how they create
    news titles to get viewers to click. You might add a related video or a picture or two to grab people interested about what you’ve written. In my opinion,
    it could make your posts a little livelier.

Comments are closed.