The News Cycle Without Trump’s Tweets

  • Share












By Ben Shapiro

Let’s pretend President Trump didn’t tweet.

Let’s live in a universe where the president of the United States didn’t see fit to insert himself into every controversy, to comment on every passing event, to blast out his inner monologue before tens of millions of Americans each morning — often in the most foolish, controversial or outright xenophobic way — while watching cable news.

Here’s what the news cycle would look like.

Last week, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., went to war with the most famous member of her House contingent, freshman Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y. After months of vacillating between praise for AOC’s supposed energy and put-downs of AOC’s radicalism and attacks on moderate Democrats, Pelosi’s sneering finally triggered AOC, who promptly brought out her heavy guns: She suggested that Pelosi is a racist targeting congresswomen of color. She even suggested that Pelosi is responsible for the death threats she had received. This, in turn, triggered members of the Congressional Black Caucus to come to Pelosi’s defense, and that triggered other members of AOC’s so-called squad to come to her defense. By the end of the week, the seething, bubbling war between radicals and mere progressives was threatening to crack the Democratic coalition.

Also last week, Democratic presidential candidates continued their quest to push their party toward the far left. Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., maintained her hypocritical attacks on former President Joe Biden for his lack of support for federal busing, a policy she herself doesn’t support. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., trotted out a new spending plan with no way to pay for it. Harris and Warren prepared to attack each other for attention. Meanwhile, virtually all the major Democratic candidates outside of Biden kept up their drumbeat of criticism of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, demanding an open-borders agenda entirely at odds with the mainstream of American public thought.

 

This drumbeat came complete with an actual act of violence, as well as a public relations nightmare for the open-borders left. In Washington state, 69-year-old Willem Van Spronsen, armed with a rifle and incendiary devices, attempted to light a car on fire and ignite a propane tank outside a Tacoma migrant detention center to shut it down. He was shot for his trouble. Van Spronsen reportedly called himself a member of antifa, the far-left militant group.

And in Aurora, Colorado, some 2,000 people banded together outside another ICE detention facility, where a group of protesters pulled down the American flag and replaced it with the Mexican flag. Some of the protesters then attempted to burn and deface the American flag with anti-police slurs.

This would seem to have been a pretty decent news cycle for President Trump. The Democratic Party formed itself into a circular firing squad; the far left was busily reminding Americans that it's not especially fond of America altogether.

Then Trump tweeted.

For years, we've heard that Trump's tweeting is a key to his success. There's certainly truth to the notion that Trump is able to redirect the news cycle toward his personal whims based on the click of a few buttons. But with great power comes great risk. When the president decides to tweet, "'Progressive' Democrat Congresswomen ... originally came from countries whose governments are a complete and total catastrophe ... Why don't they go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came," the narrative shifts. The news cycle becomes about Trump's xenophobia (three of the congresswomen he's apparently talking about were born in the United States); Democrats reunite against him; and the dangers of anti-ICE rhetoric are deliberately obscured by the media.

All too often, Trump's tweets are bad, both morally and politically. And the media would always prefer to jabber about those tweets than about news that harms Democrats. So why would Trump continue to provide them the oxygen they so desperately seek?

14 thoughts on “The News Cycle Without Trump’s Tweets”

  1. Keep twiiting Trump the only way your constituients will know your side of things cause the media won’t cover the good things you are doing

  2. IT’S TRUE THAT TRUMP PROBABLY SHOULD HAVE JUST SAT ON THE SIDELINES AND LET THE DEMONRATS GO AT EACH OTHER. BUT, THEN AGAIN, HIS TWEETS MADE HIS POPULARITY RISE AND NOW PEOPLE WHO DIDN’T EVEN KNOW WHO OMAR IS, DISLIKE HER IMMENSELY! SO, TWEET AWAY, MY GREAT PRESIDENT TRUMP!

  3. Was it really called for to call our president xenophobic for speaking the truth about the four scumbag hood rats, two of them terrorists who belong in gitmo subjected to waterboarding or worse for betrayal of America? I call him normal. I wish he could fire all these assholes

  4. I’ve had it with yours and others constant criticisms of President Trump’s tweets!! We wanted and elected a FIGHTER for America, too much of the news IS fake, he’s only tweeting the truth, and I say, “Tweet On!!!”, Mr. President!

    1. Darn good point, Bill. If President Trump remains silent, soon the Liberal Mayhem will become the Great American Portrait and all the wonderful things we’ve accomplished will be washed away, giving us the image of just another Third World Country. Why would tourists and REAL immigrants want to come here if all they’re going to see is ANTIFA, L.A’s disgrace, Frisco’s trash and uncaged zoo type creatures (men in bras, etc.) For that matter, why would REAL Americans want to stay here?

  5. This article is a classic example of the ‘all other things being equal’ fallacy. There is no reality in which Trump’s lack of tweets magically reforms the biased press.

  6. “Let’s live in a universe where the president of the United States didn’t see fit to insert himself into every controversy, to comment on every passing event, to blast out his inner monologue before tens of millions of Americans each morning — often in the most foolish, controversial or outright xenophobic way. . . .” — Do you mean exactly like Ben Shapiro does every day?
    Doesn’t Ben Shapiro “see fit to insert himself into every controversy, to comment on every passing event, to blast out his inner monologue before tens of millions of Americans each morning”?
    It is kind of like the difference between prostitution and pornography — it is bad and illegitimate — unless you make a living getting paid for doing it in front of the camera before the whole world every day. Then somehow, it is legitimized.
    If the President “inserts himself into every controversy,” that’s bad! But if Ben Shapiro inserts himself into every controversy and gets paid for doing it in front of the camera every day, well, that’s legitimate and just as it should be!

  7. It is obvious from the time stamp on comments as they post that this website has nothing to do with the United States of America and is being generated from somewhere in Europe or West Africa — and therefore should not be supported or given any attention by any American Patriot. It is either just some European/Africa hacker’s clickbait — or more likely, a fake “conservative” website established for the purpose of American political disruption or disinformation.
    Check out the “Contact” or “About” links at the top of the page for further confirmation that “Inside Scoop Politics” is completely fake.

  8. You put together all the negative democrat things, to put forth a narrative, of Trump interrupting their own picking on each other. But there was a lot more to the news than that. Meanwhile ,between all their news they intertwined and picked on Trump, as they always do, which has nothing to do with his tweets. The squad had been trying to impeach Trump, and accusing him of treason, what ever. So he has a right to defend himself, and probably got tired of them trashing the country. I think his tweets are necessary. They let his base know he is very aware of what the news is reporting, and what is going on, and he has an opinion on it. So glad to know what he is thinking. Like he said before, he would not have gotten the presidency without his tweets. Just like you, I am glad to know what you are thinking also.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *