Biden Plays the Race Card

By Patrick Buchanan

As he debated with himself whether to enter the race for the 2020 Democratic nomination, Joe Biden knew he had a problem.

As a senator from Delaware in the ’70s, he had bashed busing to achieve racial balance in public schools as stupid and racist.

As chairman of Senate Judiciary in the hearings on the nomination of Clarence Thomas in 1991, Biden had been dismissive of the charges by Anita Hill that the future justice had sexually harassed her.


In 1994, Biden had steered to passage a tough anti-crime bill that led to a dramatic increase in the prison population.

Crime went down as U.S. prisons filled up, but Biden's bill came to be seen by many African Americans as discriminatory.

What to do? Acting on the adage that your best defense is a good offense, Biden decided to tear into President Donald Trump — for giving aid and comfort to white racists.

His announcement video began with footage of the 2017 white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, highlighting Trump's remark, after the brawl that left a female protestor dead, that there were "very fine people on both sides."

"With those words," said Biden, "the president of the United States assigned a moral equivalence between those spreading hate and those with the courage to stand against it. And in that moment, I realized that the threat to this nation was unlike any I had seen in my lifetime."

Cut it out, Joe. This is just not credible. Even he cannot believe Trump had in mind the neo-Nazis and Klansman chanting, "Jews will not replace us!" when Trump said there were "fine people" on both sides.

If this were truly a road-to-Damascus moment for Biden, calling forth a new resolve to remove so morally obtuse a resident of the Oval Office, why did he have to agonize so long before getting in the race?

And was Charlottesville, a riot involving Klansmen, neo-Nazis and radicals, really a "threat to this nation" unlike any Biden had seen in a lifetime that covers the Cuban missile crisis, Vietnam, the riots in 100 cities after Martin Luther King's assassination and Sept. 11?

Even the anti-Trump media seemed skeptical. Their first interviews after Biden's announcement were not about Charlottesville but why it took so long to call Anita Hill to apologize.

Yet there is an unstated message in the Biden video. It is this:

With the economy firing on all eight cylinders, and the drive for impeachment losing steam, a new strategy is emerging — to take Trump down by stuffing him in a box with white supremacists.

The strategy is not original. It was tried, but backfired on Hillary Clinton when she called Trump supporters "deplorables ... racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic ... bigots."

This didn't sit well with some white folks in Wisconsin, Michigan and Middle Pennsylvania.

Yet the never-Trumpers seem to think it could work this time.

After Saturday's attack on the Passover service in Poway, California, which took a woman's life, Trump denounced the atrocity, expressed his condolences, called Rabbi Yisroel Goldstein, who had been wounded, and consoled him for 15 minutes.

"Nevertheless," wrote The Washington Post Monday in a front-page headline, "President's words push race to fore of campaign."

"The rise of white nationalist violence during Trump's tenure is emerging as an issue," said the Post, because Trump "previously played down the threat posed by white nationalism (and) ... also has a long history of anti-Muslim remarks."

The article should be taken seriously. For the Post is not only an enemy of Trump but a powerful institutional ally of the left. And during presidential campaigns, it doubles as an oppo research and attack arm of the Democratic Party.

"Violence, Hate Crimes Emerge as 2020 Issues" declared the inside headline on the Post story. The Post is not talking about customary crimes of violence in America or D.C. — robbery, rape, assault, battery, murder — a disproportionate share of which are committed by minorities of color.

The crimes that interest the Post are those committed by white males against minorities, which can be used to flesh out the picture of America that preexists in the mind of the left, if not in the real world.

Yet it does appear that issues of race, tribe and identity are becoming an obsession in our politics. This weekend, The New York Times faced charges of anti-Semitism for a cartoon of a blind Trump in a skullcap being led by a seeing-eye dog with the face of "Bibi" Netanyahu, who had a Star of David on his collar.

Recoiling under fire, the Times pulled the cartoon and apologized.

On Monday, Rev. Al Sharpton met with "Mayor Pete" Buttigieg. Subject of discussion: Reparations for slavery, which ended more than a century before the mayor was born.

"All is race," wrote Disraeli in his novel "Tancred." "There is no other truth."

When you sign up to comment you'll also receive our regular newsletter. You can find more about how we use your information here.

27 thoughts on “Biden Plays the Race Card”

    1. Al Sharpton has been a thorn in everyone’s side for decades. He tries to appear as a reincarnated Rev. King, but he has said things publicly the Dr. King would never have said. He belongs to the Muslim brothershood and is in it with OUR “WonderfulL”, “scandal free” black president. He hate a tray full of what his agenda was going to be. Only those he didn’t share with the people. He kept it to himself and his little bunch of heretics and kept telling us LIES after LIES. And then took away many rights we’d had for years. He had the audacity to say in loud booming terms that he as the President. had a totally free 8 years without any scandals. Just he, himself, is a lie. It cost him $2M. dollars to come up with an acceptable birth certificate. Everyone kissed his feet, thought he was the “ONLY” man to straighten our country out by demoralizing our Military, force people to pay/take his Obamacare that he said was like the Bible of healthcare. He allowed the Clintons to “give” uranium to Russians and yes, the Russians paid, right in to the Clinton Foundation. The plutonium went to Iran with $150,/// M dollars under the dark of night. He took away the World DAY OF PRAYER. HE TRIED TO KICK THE “SISTERS OF THE POOR” OUT OF THEIR “HOME”. HIS WIFE TOOK PLANE LOADS OF “HER “ FRIENDS ON TRIP ALL OVER THE WORLD IN THE Air Force 2. TOWARDS THE END OF THE HORRIFIC 8 YEARS, MICHELE SAID AFAATER ONE EVENT THAT, :SHE WAS FINALLY PROUD OF AMERICA”! DOES SHE MEAN BEFORE SHE HATED US AND NOW SHE LIKES UP. FROM BOOKS I HAVE READ MICHELE WAS THE BLACK WHO WANTED TO BE WHITE AND KNEW SHE COULDNT. HE SIGNED ALL SORTS OF BILLS BY HIMSELF THAT WERE SUPPOSED TO BE VOTED ON BY THE CONGRESS. HE AND THE KILLER HELLERY, DID NOT HAVE THE CAJONES TO SAY THEY MADE A HYUGE BOO< BOO OVER BENGHAZI. I COULD GO ON AND ON BUT OBAMA HAD HUGE SCANDALS THAT HE KEPT SECRET EVEN TO THIS DAY. HE IS A NASTY,LIAR, AND TRAITOR TO OUR COUNTRY, AS HE WAS GOING TO RESTRUCTURE OUR COUNTRY TO A SOCIALIST 3RD WORLD COUNTRY.

  1. The first slaves brought to the colonies was in 1619 four months before black were brought here. I guess I’m entitled to reparations , but I guess I’l have to get them from England since we were not a country yet, we were an English colony.

    1. Ummm, you are wrong sir. First slaves were indeed Africans. They were brought here by the Spaniards, in early 1500s…roughly 100 years before the English settlers. They then were abandoned and left to fend for themselves, when the First Peoples drove out the Spaniards. Lo and amazing thing happened. The Red Man openly welcomed the Black Man. So…100 years before the English settlers arrived, the Africans had already settled…perhaps by default..nonetheless…they were 100 years ahead of White European settlers. So…place blame where due…Spain…and give credit and appropriate honorifics to first non-First Peoples settlers…Africans. Not to leave out Leif Erricson, but he’s not included in historical discussions involving Africans and slavery of same, tho he predates the Spaniards by 400-500 years. This concludes today’s lesson in “lies my teacher told me”.

  2. President Trump never said white nationalist. He only said nationalist! Remember the media were the ones that said that the President said white nationalist. Read your dictionary if you even have one for the definition!

  3. Good post. I learn something new and challenging on websites I stumbleupon on a
    daily basis. It’s always interesting to read articles from other
    authors and practice something from their sites.

  4. Incredible! This blog looks just like my old one! It’s on a completely different subject but it
    has pretty much the same page layout and design. Superb choice of colors!

  5. You’ve made some good points there. I looked on the internet for more information about the
    issue and found most individuals will go along with your views on this

  6. I got this website from my pal who informed me concerning this site
    and at the moment this time I am browsing this site and reading very
    informative articles or reviews at this place.

  7. Hi there! Do you use Twitter? I’d like to follow you
    if that would be okay. I’m undoubtedly enjoying your blog and look forward to new

  8. Heya i’m for the primary time here. I found this
    board and I in finding It truly useful & it helped me out a
    lot. I hope to provide something again and help others such as you aided me.

  9. Thanks for the marvelous posting! I seriously enjoyed reading
    it, you can be a great author.I will make certain to bookmark
    your blog and will often come back someday.
    I want to encourage one to continue your great work,
    have a nice afternoon!

Comments are closed.